Mostly food. Sometimes other stuff.
It's interesting how conservatives want to go over "activist" judges when it isn't them being the activists. Scalia claims to follow the Constitution "where it leads him," but that seems to always lead him back to contradictory reasoning. In his reasoning for writing against racial preferences in college recruiting he points to equal protection, and yet, that same protection wasn't there when he dissented in the Texas sodomy case. It's just simply amazing.
Post a Comment